0852e28e75
* multiple styles, layouts * shared content * central pigs * conditional htaccess * first half of multiple configs
1.5 KiB
| title | date | techne | episteme |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitler Was Right | 2012-03-30 | :wip | :mindkiller |
This article is highly political. It's firmly in mind-killing territory, and to some degree, contains outright trolling. You've been warned.
One of the most powerful weapons of a winning ideology is to define the framework of acceptable political debate. From within the framework, political debates seem wide and nuanced. From without, they are anything but - narrow, highly selective, barely distinguishable.
As a result, even controversial debates within the framework share virtually all their conclusions, and disagree mostly about priorities and justifications.
TODO example
Let's try actual political dissent: Hitler was right.
This must be a kind of novel position to argue, as even Neo-Nazis don't actually side with Hitler anymore. They are ideological pussies and an offense to actual Nazism1. No one thinks Hitler had a point, but I think he did.
This position is so firmly off the charts, that I can't even invoke any reasonable disclaimer here. So let's just start and not worry about politics while I argue that Hitler was right.
Hitler Was Right About Judaism
Hitler Was Right About Bolshevism
Hitler Was Right About Germany's Fate
Hitler Was Right About His Role In History
If anyone counts as a Tragical Hero, it's him.
-
That's right, I'm writing a Hitlerist criticism of Neo-Nazism. Doesn't happen much these days. ↩︎