new log, latin draft work

master
muflax 2012-07-19 02:18:14 +02:00
parent 5b30633139
commit acfb9de13b
5 changed files with 61 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -246,3 +246,5 @@
[Albigensian Crusade]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albigensian_Crusade
[Eight Deadly Words]: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/EightDeadlyWords
[Death Note Matt]: http://deathnote.wikia.com/wiki/Matt
[monotonic]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotonic_function
[Dependent Arising]: http://www.buddhanet.net/bud_lt12.htm

View File

@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
<!-- external links -->
[AJATT]: http://www.alljapaneseallthetime.com/
[Age of Decadence]: http://www.irontowerstudio.com/
[Alan Dawrst]: http://www.utilitarian-essays.com/suffering-nature.html
[Anders Shirt]: http://www.katzundgoldt.de/ru_anders.htm
@ -117,6 +116,7 @@
[Legend of Grimrock]: http://store.steampowered.com/app/207170/
[Space Pirates and Zombies]: http://store.steampowered.com/app/107200/
[HPMOR]: http://hpmor.com/
[Khatz System]: http://www.alljapaneseallthetime.com/blog/the-search-for-the-system-how-i-found-one-why-you-need-one
<!-- onion -->
[onion horoscope]: http://www.theonion.com/articles/your-horoscopes-week-of-january-10-2012,27001/
@ -165,6 +165,7 @@
[LW virtues]: http://yudkowsky.net/rational/virtues
[LW timeless physics]: http://lesswrong.com/lw/qp/timeless_physics/
[LW fun theory]: http://lesswrong.com/lw/y0/31_laws_of_fun/
[LW obvious]: http://lesswrong.com/lw/9q5/on_saying_the_obvious/
<!-- Hanson -->
[Hanson smile]: http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/09/poor-folks-do-smile.html
@ -237,6 +238,10 @@
[reddit lain]: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/t0ynr/throwaway_time_whats_your_secret_that_could/c4inqul
[Xmonad Bug]: http://www.reddit.com/r/xmonad/comments/fdp4o/let_focus_follow_mouse_only_on_certain_layouts/
<!-- ajatt -->
[AJATT]: http://www.alljapaneseallthetime.com/
[AJATT system]: http://www.alljapaneseallthetime.com/blog/the-search-for-the-system-how-i-found-one-why-you-need-one
<!-- books -->
[Introduction to Bayesian Statistics]: http://libgen.info/view.php?id=12067
[The Attention Revolution]: http://www.amazon.com/Attention-Revolution-Unlocking-Power-Focused/dp/0861712765

View File

@ -77,3 +77,4 @@
[viðrar vel til loftárása]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akYuy2FMQk4
[Sailor Moon Live Action]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hLsW0DGtq0
[Schwarzenegger japanese]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcfI0gf9oDc
[Mitch payments]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e30kiVY_ja4

View File

@ -9,6 +9,16 @@ This is the second post in a 2-part series about learning to read Latin, or any
---
How would one learn to read Latin, [systematically][AJATT system]? Well, it only needs to fulfill two requirements.
First, **the rate at which you learn new stuff must be greater than the rate at which you forget old stuff**. If that is not the case, then you're the poor shmuck trying to save the Titanic by being really fast with your single bucket. But if your skill always increases, even if just a little bit, then as long as you keep going, You Will Win. There are no dead-ends for [monontonic functions][monotonic], my friend.
"But", I hear you lament, "maybe it gets really hard at some point! I'm a lazy-ass learner and I hate any effort whatsoever!" My, how honest of you! But don't worry - me too. Keep the effort for the workaholic law school students, we'll be eating pizza and reading Roman poetry instead.
This brings us the other rule: *every single step along the way must be doable*. It must always be easy. *Always*. No "[three easy payments and one fucking complicated one][Mitch payments]".
Fortunately, there are plenty of such systems. Here is mine.
So what's important?
First, we want to understand the sentence. That's the whole point of this journey after all. Not to brag how large our vocabulary is, or how we know what an ablative is, or how intelligent it would makes us look when we tell them we're fluent in Latin. No, *we want to actually read texts*. People forget that, sometimes.

42
content_daily/log/73.mkd Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
title: Not Now Sweetie, Daddy Needs A Little Jesus First
date: 2012-07-18
techne: :done
episteme: :log
---
I hate it when [Khatz writes what I want to say][Khatz System], but shorter and better.
<% skip do %>
But seriously, I actually *don't* hate it when I see the same points re-iterated in a new form. I actually love that, and re-read it whenever I can (assuming I care about the topic).
As [Grognor correctly observed][LW obvious], saying the obvious might be bad if you're trying to signal intelligence, but is absolutely crucial otherwise. Topics are complex and have lots of interdependencies, so even being told the same thing five different ways might teach you something new every time.
And, repetition matters if you want to actually remember anything. And because we're all lazy and don't put new information in our SRS right away, as a semi-sane species would[^sane], we can compensate for that by re-visiting points all the time. By saying the obvious, again, in our own words.
[^sane]: A fully sane species would design better memory that doesn't need repetition, of course.
<% end %>
Anyway, despite all that, I've basically finished the second Latin post. Only I currently don't have The Funny, so it's much less fun to read (and write). I'll wait a few days, maybe some inspiration will come up. If not, I'll just wrap it up and publish it anyway.
---
I've also been reading more HPMOR (chapter 17 or so). I mean, it's still funny, well-written and the plot is getting interesting. It does get more tolerable now that Harry isn't entirely in the foreground anymore, and now that he becomes more self-aware. I expect I'm still gonna read the whole thing, and enjoy it, but needlessly complain about it all the way.
---
Tried something I pretentiously call "meaninglessness yoga". It's pretty simple. You do something, say eat breakfast, just like you always do. Except, while you do it, you say, "this is meaningless, that is meaningless; when this arises, it is meaningless, when that arises, it is meaningless".
Something in my head is obsessed with this vague notion of meaningfulness, and complains constantly about its absence. When I'm especially tired or low on energy, it tends to dominate my internal chatter. Unfortunately, it can't tell me *what* this "meaning" is, and so I can't ever satisfy it.
Thus, meaninglessness yoga. If all is meaningless, breakfast is meaningless. [If this arises][Dependent Arising], that arises meaninglessly. If this ceases, that ceases meaninglessly. The monk attends to all sensations and notes their meaninglessness. Seeing thus, the monk grows disenchanted with meaninglessness. Disenchanted, he is still hungry, and eats his meaningless breakfast in peace.
(1 hour of noting meaninglessness.)
---
Have been working somewhat on my MCD code. (Again.) So the idea was that instead of only looking at individual morphemes, I could also track n-grams. Most n-grams would be useless, but some frequent ones might be interesting to generate cards for (e.g. by tracking better-than-chance collocations).
No results yet, still experimenting.