new log
parent
a4cc5cc556
commit
2363d5f633
|
@ -49,3 +49,4 @@
|
|||
[God talks back]: http://vimeo.com/20204758
|
||||
[synchronization]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1TMZASCR-I
|
||||
[tacoma]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=j-zczJXSxnw#t=183s
|
||||
[w40k librarian]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf_3ZTp4eG4
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Before Abraham observed, I know.
|
||||
date: 2012-05-13
|
||||
techne: :done
|
||||
episteme: :log
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Worked on the first version of my self-experimentation protocols and tools. Basically, I'm going all professional, and I'm developing *precise* (as in, numerical answer and specific algorithm, not "that feels about right") methods to do self-experiments. Mostly because I'm extremely ashamed and disgusted that I don't have those *already*[^elimination].
|
||||
|
||||
[^elimination]: Through the elimination of hypotheses do we earn our enlightenment.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm writing all of this up, of course, and I'll publish drafts as soon as possible. This is literally top priority for me. The only reason I don't have a draft out already is because I want to do one complete run so I see that I'm not missing anything, to demonstrate to myself that I'm not doing any handwaving. Then I'll iterate to victory.
|
||||
|
||||
The idea is to do meta-empiricism: test empiricism, see if it works. Once I have some meta-data, some actual "look what awesome results that brought me", beyond "that's like that thing Eliezer was talking about", I'll actually advocate people do that, and shame[^shame] those who don't. If it doesn't, I'll drop the "rationalist" bit from my identity <del>and become a bitter troll</del>.
|
||||
|
||||
[^shame]: A moment of imprecision spawns a lifetime of confusion.
|
||||
|
||||
(Also, [the Librarian][w40k librarian] is a true rationalist. Learn from him, and beware the alien, the mutant, the heretic.)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue