2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
title: On the Crucifixion
|
|
|
|
|
date: 2011-03-11
|
|
|
|
|
techne: :rough
|
|
|
|
|
episteme: :broken
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-29 19:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
<%= youtube("http://www.youtube.com/v/PZBqsqvfj0Y") %>
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We know that the crucifixion of Christ is a myth[^1]. We also know that it isn't
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
unique; there are plenty of life-death-rebirth gods. The theme goes back to at
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
least 2,000BCE in its explicit form. But what's the charm? What is its
|
|
|
|
|
attraction?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two points that can be made, I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
The first would be a [Jaynesian][Julian Jaynes] argument; that the early
|
|
|
|
|
"reborn" gods are hallucinations of former rulers that continued beyond their
|
|
|
|
|
death. The king would give commands, many of which were in the form of explicit
|
|
|
|
|
voice-hallucinations by his subjects, and as such they tended to hang around a
|
|
|
|
|
while after the king's death. The bodily death of a person didn't wipe it out
|
|
|
|
|
completely; resurrection becomes obvious. (I'm not gonna give a detailed account
|
|
|
|
|
how this worked, for Jaynes and others have already done so.) I find this very
|
|
|
|
|
convincing for many cases. [^2]
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of Jesus, however, we have a somewhat different scenario. For one,
|
|
|
|
|
it plays out much too late. The bicameral mind would've already largely been
|
|
|
|
|
gone, so it seems unlikely that many of the early believers actually had the
|
|
|
|
|
dead still hanging around. (Which, of course, is the main reason reborn gods
|
|
|
|
|
have fallen out of favor since then.) Furthermore, it seems unlikely that the
|
|
|
|
|
man existed in the first place. His resurrection was not a construction to
|
|
|
|
|
explain away his incomplete death; instead, death came first and life was build
|
|
|
|
|
around it much later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luckily, early Christianity is the best documented idea of the whole ancient
|
|
|
|
|
world, so let's take a closer look how the story unfolded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two sources we can build on, Mark and Paul[^3]. Additionally, we will
|
|
|
|
|
take a look at John, as will become clear soon. While it may be possible that
|
|
|
|
|
Mark is actually a later, condensed gospel, I find the argument for it
|
|
|
|
|
unconvincing. The story is much too sober and it already has signs of extension,
|
|
|
|
|
so it seems more likely to me that Mark is one of the earliest documents, maybe
|
|
|
|
|
even the first written gospel, period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What stands out in Mark's gospel is the lack of a biography. Jesus appears out
|
|
|
|
|
of nowhere, gets baptized, heals a lot of people, appoints his staff and finally
|
|
|
|
|
is killed. The miracle stories are very non-specific, giving just minimalist
|
|
|
|
|
accounts, reminiscent of today's anecdotes about "spiritual healers" (c.f.
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[Sathya Sai Baba][]). The person described here is just one con-man among many,
|
|
|
|
|
with some Jewish justification thrown in in an obvious attempt to later support
|
|
|
|
|
his authority over the Jews, capitalizing on John the Baptist as well.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But the tone changes dramatically at the end. Suddenly, Jesus becomes insecure
|
|
|
|
|
and actually takes his own practices seriously. Before, you get the impression
|
|
|
|
|
he is doing all the miracles, handing out the teachings only for his own profit
|
|
|
|
|
or to shut people up. Now, he begs God to save him! This might certainly be a
|
|
|
|
|
later addition, retconning a sudden arrest into an expected betrayal. Yet
|
|
|
|
|
observe Jesus on the cross. Mark (15-16) tells it like this[^4]:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> It was nine o'clock in the morning when they crucified him. The inscription of
|
|
|
|
|
> the charge against him read, "The king of the Jews". And they crucified two
|
|
|
|
|
> outlaws with him, one on his right and one on his left. Those who passed by
|
|
|
|
|
> defamed him, shaking their heads and saying, "Aha! You who can destroy the
|
|
|
|
|
> temple and rebuild it in three days, save yourself and come down from the
|
|
|
|
|
> cross!" In the same way even the chief priests - together with the experts in
|
|
|
|
|
> the law - were mocking him among themselves: "He saved others, but he cannot
|
|
|
|
|
> save himself! Let the Christ, the king of Israel, come down from the cross
|
|
|
|
|
> now, that we may see and believe!" Those who were crucified with him also
|
|
|
|
|
> spoke abusively to him.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Now when it was noon, darkness came over the whole land until three in the
|
|
|
|
|
> afternoon. Around three o'clock Jesus cried out with a loud voice, "Eloi,
|
|
|
|
|
> Eloi, lema sabachthani?" which means, "My God, my God, why have you forsaken
|
|
|
|
|
> me?" When some of the bystanders heard it they said, "Listen, he is calling
|
|
|
|
|
> for Elijah!" Then someone ran, filled a sponge with sour wine, put it on a
|
|
|
|
|
> stick, and gave it to him to drink, saying, "Leave him alone! Let's see if
|
|
|
|
|
> Elijah will come to take him down!" But Jesus cried out with a loud voice and
|
|
|
|
|
> breathed his last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Son of Man is clearly panicking, not in control at all. He dies on the
|
|
|
|
|
cross and is quickly buried.[^5] Finally, Mark concludes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Then as they went into the tomb, they saw a young man dressed in a white robe
|
|
|
|
|
> sitting on the right side; and they were alarmed. But he said to them, "Do not
|
|
|
|
|
> be alarmed. You are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who was crucified. He has
|
|
|
|
|
> been raised! He is not here. Look, there is the place where they laid him. But
|
|
|
|
|
> go, tell his disciples, even Peter, that he is going ahead of you into
|
|
|
|
|
> Galilee. You will see him there, just as he told you." Then they went out and
|
|
|
|
|
> ran from the tomb, for terror and bewilderment had seized them. And they said
|
|
|
|
|
> nothing to anyone, because they were afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It just ends there. Jesus doesn't even appear after his death. None of his
|
|
|
|
|
teachings, in any way, justify his death or give it any meaning whatsoever. He
|
|
|
|
|
is just suddenly taken away and killed, story over. The earlier "prophecies" and
|
|
|
|
|
assurances that it went "just as planned" are clearly later additions, but the
|
|
|
|
|
core seems very harsh. In fact, there's barely any attempt at wisdom or
|
|
|
|
|
teaching![^6] This gospel is not about resurrection at all.[^7]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's take a look at Paul. Taking a conservative approach[^8], there are
|
|
|
|
|
four authentic letters, namely Romans, I+II Corinthians and Galatians. Some of
|
|
|
|
|
the others might be authentic, at least partially, but existing dogma hides the
|
|
|
|
|
early developments we want to see. Paul writes about a lot of stuff, much of
|
|
|
|
|
which is of little importance to us. Like Mark, he rarely gives any *explicit
|
|
|
|
|
teaching* about or by Jesus. He insists that truth is revealed to him by God,
|
|
|
|
|
but he never feels the need to actually articulate this truth. Some vague
|
|
|
|
|
sentiments and emotional sing-song are enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, in I Corinthians 1:11-31, Paul writes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> For Christ did not send me to baptize[^9], but to preach the gospel - and not
|
|
|
|
|
> with clever speech, so that the cross of Christ would not become useless. For
|
|
|
|
|
> the message about the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to
|
|
|
|
|
> us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written, "I will
|
|
|
|
|
> destroy the wisdom of the wise, and I will thwart the cleverness of the
|
|
|
|
|
> intelligent." Where is the wise man? Where is the expert in the Mosaic law?
|
|
|
|
|
> Where is the debater of this age? Has God not made the wisdom of the world
|
|
|
|
|
> foolish? For since in the wisdom of God the world by its wisdom did not know
|
|
|
|
|
> God, God was pleased to save those who believe by the foolishness of
|
|
|
|
|
> preaching. For Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks ask for wisdom, but we
|
|
|
|
|
> preach about a crucified Christ, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to
|
|
|
|
|
> Gentiles. But to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is the
|
|
|
|
|
> power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than
|
|
|
|
|
> human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Think about the circumstances of your call, brothers and sisters. Not many
|
|
|
|
|
> were wise by human standards, not many were powerful, not many were born to a
|
|
|
|
|
> privileged position. But God chose what the world thinks foolish to shame the
|
|
|
|
|
> wise, and God chose what the world thinks weak to shame the strong. God chose
|
|
|
|
|
> what is low and despised in the world, what is regarded as nothing, to set
|
|
|
|
|
> aside what is regarded as something, so that no one can boast in his presence.
|
|
|
|
|
> He is the reason you have a relationship with Christ Jesus, who became for us
|
|
|
|
|
> wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification and redemption, so that,
|
|
|
|
|
> as it is written, "Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul is very explicit here in his outright rejection of any kind of argument. No
|
|
|
|
|
wonder the teaching is so lacking of content; it is empty on purpose! Paul takes
|
|
|
|
|
his conviction from the warm, fuzzy feelings he gets when he thinks of (not
|
|
|
|
|
about!) the Christ. Everything else, he argues from Jewish law or his own
|
|
|
|
|
prejudices. There is literally nothing about the actual crucifixion or even the
|
|
|
|
|
character of Jesus Christ in there. It is merely a source for him to draw all
|
|
|
|
|
this "faith" from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What, then, is the crucifixion? What did later Christians get it *from*? All we
|
|
|
|
|
have seen so far are miracles stories, interpretations of Jewish law and some
|
|
|
|
|
organizational issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What we really see happening is a hijacking. Gnostic thinkers, most notably
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[Marcion][] and [Simon Magus][] [^10], develop their own theology, based on Jewish
|
|
|
|
|
mythology, a rejection of Jewish law and many (mostly Greek) mystic techniques.
|
|
|
|
|
To increase mass appeal, they retrofit it into existing legends and begin a
|
|
|
|
|
process of "historization", identifying a spiritual messiah figure with an
|
|
|
|
|
actual person. Over time, the idea of a Jewish faith healer as central figure of
|
|
|
|
|
a cosmic struggle sticks, people like it and the myth moves. Mark assimilates
|
|
|
|
|
anecdotes and myth into a plausible story. Followers like it, but the narrative
|
|
|
|
|
is severely lacking. Luke and Matthew rewrite it, introducing many new popular
|
|
|
|
|
anecdotes, giving Jesus an actual character and adding a proper arc structure.
|
|
|
|
|
Now intellectuals can find something in there, too! That's the way the story
|
|
|
|
|
should've happened, you know.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Believing that Jesus must have lived (others say so), and that his teachings
|
|
|
|
|
must've been profound (his followers swear by it), mystics start substituting
|
|
|
|
|
their own ideas for whatever really happened and teach what they thought the
|
|
|
|
|
Son of Man should've taught. Full fan-fiction mode kicks in and a couple of
|
|
|
|
|
decades later, all coherent structure is gone. The New Testament is born,
|
|
|
|
|
optimized for sounding as profound and authoritative as possible without
|
|
|
|
|
excluding any prevailing idea, pandering to as many biases and prejudices as
|
|
|
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, the crucifixion is a form of secularization[^11], making
|
|
|
|
|
abstract mystic teaching more palpable by giving them concrete form. We could
|
|
|
|
|
look at early Gnostic documents or try to reconstruct them from similar, but
|
|
|
|
|
better documented traditions (say, the Upanishads, the Pali Canon or Crowley's
|
|
|
|
|
work). But let's unravel it from the inside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We come now to John, whose gospel is a clear case of later Christian editing of
|
|
|
|
|
an originally Gnostic document. Just look at this beginning:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was
|
|
|
|
|
> fully God. The Word was with God in the beginning. All things were created by
|
|
|
|
|
> him, and apart from him not one thing was created that has been created. In
|
|
|
|
|
> him was life, and the life was the light of mankind. And the light shines on
|
|
|
|
|
> in the darkness, but the darkness has not mastered it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except for a change of names, this is exactly the basic Gnostic world view of
|
|
|
|
|
the Supreme God from whom all other beings emanate, of the broken Demiurge that
|
|
|
|
|
makes the world but doesn't understand it, and of Sophia (wisdom) who brings the
|
|
|
|
|
divine spark into this world, giving humanity its soul and way of liberation.
|
|
|
|
|
John's new Jesus is divine in ways he never was in Mark. God is not Jehovah
|
|
|
|
|
anymore - the god that walked the earth, talked to people and messed with their
|
|
|
|
|
affairs. John's God is as unworldly as can be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But back to the cross. After preparing his disciples for the upcoming sacrifice,
|
|
|
|
|
Jesus is arrested and found guilty. John gives us a much more detailed story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> So they took Jesus, and carrying his own cross he went out to the place called
|
|
|
|
|
> "The Place of the Skull" (called in Aramaic Golgotha). There they crucified
|
|
|
|
|
> him along with two others, one on each side, with Jesus in the middle. Pilate
|
|
|
|
|
> also had a notice written and fastened to the cross, which read: "Jesus the
|
|
|
|
|
> Nazarene, the king of the Jews." Thus many of the Jewish residents of
|
|
|
|
|
> Jerusalem read this notice, because the place where Jesus was crucified was
|
|
|
|
|
> near the city, and the notice was written in Aramaic, Latin, and Greek. Then
|
|
|
|
|
> the chief priests of the Jews said to Pilate, "Do not write, 'The king of the
|
|
|
|
|
> Jews', but rather, 'This man said, I am king of the Jews.'" Pilate answered,
|
|
|
|
|
> "What I have written, I have written."
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Now when the soldiers crucified Jesus, they took his clothes and made four
|
|
|
|
|
> shares, one for each soldier, and the tunic remained. (Now the tunic was
|
|
|
|
|
> seamless, woven from top to bottom as a single piece.) So the soldiers said to
|
|
|
|
|
> one another, "Let's not tear it, but throw dice to see who will get it." This
|
|
|
|
|
> took place to fulfill the scripture that says, "They divided my garments among
|
|
|
|
|
> them, and for my clothing they threw dice." So the soldiers did these things.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Now standing beside Jesus' cross were his mother, his mother's sister, Mary
|
|
|
|
|
> the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. So when Jesus saw his mother and the
|
|
|
|
|
> disciple whom he loved standing there, he said to his mother, "Woman, look,
|
|
|
|
|
> here is your son!" He then said to his disciple, "Look, here is your mother!"
|
|
|
|
|
> From that very time the disciple took her into his own home.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> After this Jesus, realizing that by this time everything was completed, said
|
|
|
|
|
> (in order to fulfill the scripture), "I am thirsty!" A jar full of sour wine
|
|
|
|
|
> was there, so they put a sponge soaked in sour wine on a branch of hyssop and
|
|
|
|
|
> lifted it to his mouth. When he had received the sour wine, Jesus said, "It is
|
|
|
|
|
> completed!" Then he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Then, because it was the day of preparation, so that the bodies should not
|
|
|
|
|
> stay on the crosses on the Sabbath (for that Sabbath was an especially
|
|
|
|
|
> important one), the Jewish leaders asked Pilate to have the victims' legs
|
|
|
|
|
> broken and the bodies taken down. So the soldiers came and broke the legs of
|
|
|
|
|
> the two men who had been crucified with Jesus, first the one and then the
|
|
|
|
|
> other. But when they came to Jesus and saw that he was already dead, they did
|
|
|
|
|
> not break his legs. But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and
|
|
|
|
|
> blood and water flowed out immediately. And the person who saw it has
|
|
|
|
|
> testified (and his testimony is true, and he knows that he is telling the
|
|
|
|
|
> truth), so that you also may believe. For these things happened so that the
|
|
|
|
|
> scripture would be fulfilled, "Not a bone of his will be broken." And again
|
|
|
|
|
> another scripture says, "They will look on the one whom they have pierced."
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> After this, Joseph of Arimathea, a disciple of Jesus (but secretly, because he
|
|
|
|
|
> feared the Jewish leaders), asked Pilate if he could remove the body of Jesus.
|
|
|
|
|
> Pilate gave him permission, so he went and took the body away. Nicodemus, the
|
|
|
|
|
> man who had previously come to Jesus at night, accompanied Joseph, carrying a
|
|
|
|
|
> mixture of myrrh and aloes weighing about seventy-five pounds. Then they took
|
|
|
|
|
> Jesus' body and wrapped it, with the aromatic spices, in strips of linen cloth
|
|
|
|
|
> according to Jewish burial customs. Now at the place where Jesus was crucified
|
|
|
|
|
> there was a garden, and in the garden was a new tomb where no one had yet been
|
|
|
|
|
> buried. And so, because it was the Jewish day of preparation and the tomb was
|
|
|
|
|
> nearby, they placed Jesus' body there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several things stand out about this.[^12] For one, Jesus is now fulfilling all
|
|
|
|
|
kinds of prophecies. John is a great example of the later attempt to write Jesus
|
|
|
|
|
into the Jewish messiah. This is not part of the Gnostic teaching and was also
|
|
|
|
|
clearly not in Mark or other early documents. Only now does this become
|
|
|
|
|
necessary with the church spreading among and breaking away from the Jews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, Jesus now interacts with witnesses. He is finally in control. He
|
|
|
|
|
even comforts his mourning family. This doesn't look like a sacrifice at all
|
|
|
|
|
anymore. And we see one thing missing that changes the whole dynamic, that
|
|
|
|
|
betrays its Gnostic roots: God is absent. Read closely. Jesus does not pray, he
|
|
|
|
|
is not the Christ, he does not beg, does not bring the Kingdom. John's gospel is
|
|
|
|
|
not about a resurrection, but a transformation. Jesus frees the divine spirit
|
|
|
|
|
and breaks the cage of the flesh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The crucifixion is the symbol of this transformation and is used in that light
|
|
|
|
|
by Paul who references his own death and resurrection. It stands not for an
|
|
|
|
|
overcoming of death. In no meaningful way does Jesus die; his body dies, but the
|
|
|
|
|
transformation continues independent of it, as we will see now. In stark
|
|
|
|
|
contrast to Mark, John continues after Jesus' death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-29 19:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
<%= dailymotion("http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/video/xnryl") %>
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Now very early on the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary
|
|
|
|
|
> Magdalene came to the tomb and saw that the stone had been moved away from the
|
|
|
|
|
> entrance. So she went running to Simon Peter and the other disciple whom Jesus
|
|
|
|
|
> loved and told them, "They have taken the Lord from the tomb, and we don’t
|
|
|
|
|
> know where they have put him!" [...]
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> But Mary stood outside the tomb weeping. As she wept, she bent down and looked
|
|
|
|
|
> into the tomb. And she saw two angels in white sitting where Jesus' body had
|
|
|
|
|
> been lying, one at the head and one at the feet. They said to her, "Woman, why
|
|
|
|
|
> are you weeping?" Mary replied, "They have taken my Lord away, and I do not
|
|
|
|
|
> know where they have put him!" When she had said this, she turned around and
|
|
|
|
|
> saw Jesus standing there, but she did not know that it was Jesus.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> Jesus said to her, "Woman, why are you weeping? Who are you looking for?"
|
|
|
|
|
> Because she thought he was the gardener, she said to him, "Sir, if you have
|
|
|
|
|
> carried him away, tell me where you have put him, and I will take him." Jesus
|
|
|
|
|
> said to her, "Mary." She turned and said to him in Aramaic, "*Rabboni*"
|
|
|
|
|
> (which means Teacher). Jesus replied, "Do not touch me, for I have not yet
|
|
|
|
|
> ascended to my Father. Go to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my
|
|
|
|
|
> Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" Mary Magdalene came and
|
|
|
|
|
> informed the disciples, "I have seen the Lord!" And she told them what Jesus
|
|
|
|
|
> had said to her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It then goes on to fabricate a "tradition" of revelation. This kind of thing
|
|
|
|
|
becomes important for the growing church, but is of little concern to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But this ascension is important. It is a purely spiritual experience of which
|
|
|
|
|
the bodily death is just a vivid metaphor. It is the central technique around
|
|
|
|
|
which the early church is built. The miracles are only there to finance it, the
|
|
|
|
|
prophecies to gain a greater audience, the morals to further its influence. But
|
|
|
|
|
the core is this accessible, graphic and guided mystical transformation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But what *is* transformed? Now that is the real strength of the crucifixion.
|
|
|
|
|
*Everything*. *Anything*!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You see, it is a placeholder. It can take on the role of any mystic technique.
|
|
|
|
|
It is a universal metaphor. The Gnostic can see Sophia, the Theravadan can see
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
the [Arising and Passing Away][], the new convert sees hope. What the
|
|
|
|
|
crucifixion provides is a usable interpretation for a wide variety of confusing
|
|
|
|
|
experiences. Instead of having to deal with the mind and the world as they
|
|
|
|
|
really are, the crucifixion gives security. The difficult part of the ongoing
|
|
|
|
|
transformation has already been done by someone else, the purpose is clear, the
|
|
|
|
|
goal relatable. Overcoming death, freeing the spirit, getting closer to God -
|
|
|
|
|
pick whatever seems most attractive to you. The Christ died for all of these, so
|
|
|
|
|
have faith.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The crucifixion is a Rorschach blot of the psyche.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I looked at the Rorschach blot. I tried to pretend it looked like a spreading
|
|
|
|
|
> tree, shadows pooled beneath it, but it didn't. It looked more like a dead cat
|
|
|
|
|
> I once found, the fat, glistening grubs writhing blindly, squirming over each
|
|
|
|
|
> other, frantically tunneling away from the light. But even that is avoiding
|
|
|
|
|
> the real horror. The horror is this: In the end, it is simply a picture of
|
|
|
|
|
> empty meaningless blackness. We are alone. There is nothing else.
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> -- Dr. Malcolm Long, Watchmen
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-29 19:43:07 +02:00
|
|
|
|
<%= image("rorschach.jpg", "Rorschach") %>
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^1]: [Robert M. Price][], yada yada, Christ myth proponents not convincing? Do
|
2011-09-18 12:44:16 +02:00
|
|
|
|
you also believe in Oz? If not, how about Hercules? If you understand why
|
|
|
|
|
they are myth, you will understand why Christ is, too.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^2]: A completely unjustified speculation: the Buddha stands out by being the
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
only one that breaks the pattern. He taught within a context that still
|
|
|
|
|
accepted general rebirth, so continuing the theme would be very obvious and
|
|
|
|
|
in fact, later Buddhists, particularly in the Mahayana tradition, did bring
|
|
|
|
|
it back by making Buddha an ascended god, or by inventing the idea of the
|
|
|
|
|
Bodhisattva, a being that intentionally ensures its own rebirth to help
|
|
|
|
|
others. But in the original story, Buddha was a mortal who distinguished
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
himself by *not* being reborn. He successfully extinguishes himself after
|
|
|
|
|
death and his disciples didn't doubt it. Why is this remarkable? It would've
|
|
|
|
|
happened during the transition to conscious minds, according to Jaynes'
|
|
|
|
|
theory. There would be lots of remnants around, lots of old ideas colored by
|
|
|
|
|
bicameral minds. What the Buddha did, maybe, was achieve full subjective
|
|
|
|
|
consciousness(, destroy his personal god called the self) and teach it to
|
|
|
|
|
his students, thus killing the dead voices. He wouldn't hang around after
|
|
|
|
|
death because he changed the minds of his followers, so he was truly gone -
|
|
|
|
|
[Tathagata][]. Later students, already conscious, couldn't understand the
|
|
|
|
|
remarkableness of this feat anymore, so they retconned the Samsara story
|
|
|
|
|
into it, maybe even actually inverting it. Now the goal of enlightenment is
|
|
|
|
|
to destroy the linguistically constructed self and see the world "raw",
|
|
|
|
|
non-subjectively. I would strongly suspect that during this retcon, they
|
|
|
|
|
invented the figure of the Buddha, moved him closer to their time and
|
|
|
|
|
assembled his story out of ongoing myths. The "real" Buddha, the one that
|
|
|
|
|
brought death to the world, is almost certainly much older, dating back to
|
|
|
|
|
maybe 1000BCE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[^3]: Mark and Paul, of course, are likely not really Mark and Paul, but rather
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
anonymous texts attributed to the fictitious characters. Paul, at least, is
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
most likely based on a real person, in the same way that Jetpack Hitler is.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^4]: Always using the NET bible, as on [bible.org][].
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^5]: I find it fascinating that there is explicit mention of how fast Jesus
|
|
|
|
|
died. Also, his followers took his body right away. This gives some credence
|
|
|
|
|
to the idea that his death was faked. However, Jesus does not return in any
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
way. He might've successfully gone into hiding (or to India, as some
|
|
|
|
|
traditions have it), but that seems a bit too speculative to me. I don't
|
|
|
|
|
really see how you could fake a crucifixion, or why you would draw attention
|
|
|
|
|
to the fact afterwards. If Mark was in on the lie, he wouldn't have told us
|
|
|
|
|
about the preparations or the sudden death. It would look much more like
|
|
|
|
|
Luke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^6]: If you find my dismissal of Mark too harsh, try reading it yourself, but
|
|
|
|
|
as if it were new. Imagine we met at a friend's house and I introduce you to
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
some text I wrote. It's all true, I inform you. It's about my former
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese teacher, Takashi, but I wrote it in English for you, translating as
|
|
|
|
|
necessary. Try reading Mark that way, substituting Takashi for Jesus, Osaka
|
|
|
|
|
for Galilee, Suzuki the Monk for John the Baptist and so on. What would you
|
|
|
|
|
think about this Takashi? What is his message? Could you even decipher any?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^7]: There is the idea that the New Testament is a (partial) parody. Some parts
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
of it might be, especially in Acts, but I don't buy it for Mark. It follows
|
|
|
|
|
well-known woo-woo con-men structures, has obvious editing mistakes and no
|
|
|
|
|
underlying plot. The text is partially manipulative, partially sincere, as
|
|
|
|
|
is typical for the genre. Compare with reports about Sai Baba or Osho, for
|
|
|
|
|
example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^8]: I'm eagerly awaiting Price' upcoming book, "The Amazing Colossal Apostle".
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
I'm certainly seeing the merit of rejecting all Pauline letters as authentic
|
|
|
|
|
already, but I'm not fully convinced yet. Also, I didn't want to make my
|
|
|
|
|
analysis contingent on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^9]: I'd love to know what exact practices Paul is talking about. I suspect
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
something akin to what modern Pentecostals are doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^10]: Robert Price identifies Simon Magus as Paul. I haven't looked much into
|
|
|
|
|
the evidence for this yet, but it seems plausible to me.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^11]: Funny thing is, about a millennium later, the same thing happened to
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Christianity, too! The Reformation is nothing but an attempt to rationalize
|
|
|
|
|
Catholic dogma. This process continues to this very day, producing Christian
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Atheism and Universalism (see Mencius Moldbug's glorious 5-part series
|
|
|
|
|
[How Dawkins got pwned][] (link to part 5, which links to previous parts)).
|
|
|
|
|
Or, as Jaynes said it:
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> What happens in this modern dissolution of ecclesiastical authorization
|
|
|
|
|
> reminds us a little of what happened long ago after the breakdown of the
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
> bicameral mind itself. Everywhere in the contemporary world there are
|
|
|
|
|
> substitutes, other methods of authorization. Some are revivals of ancient
|
|
|
|
|
> ones: the popularity of possession religions in South America, where the
|
|
|
|
|
> church had once been so strong; extreme religious absolutism ego-based on
|
|
|
|
|
> "the Spirit", which is really the ascension of Paul over Jesus; an
|
|
|
|
|
> alarming rise in the serious acceptance of astrology, that direct heritage
|
|
|
|
|
> from the period of the breakdown of the bicameral mind in the Near East;
|
|
|
|
|
> or the more minor divination of the *I Ching*, also a direct heritage from
|
|
|
|
|
> the period just after the breakdown in China. There are also the huge
|
|
|
|
|
> commercial and sometimes psychological successes of various meditation
|
|
|
|
|
> procedures, sensitivity training groups, mind control, and group encounter
|
|
|
|
|
> practices. Other persuasions often seem like escapes from a new boredom of
|
|
|
|
|
> unbelief, but are also characterized by this search for authorization:
|
|
|
|
|
> faiths in various pseudosciences, as in scientology, or in unidentified
|
|
|
|
|
> flying objects bringing authority from other parts of our universe, or
|
|
|
|
|
> that gods were at one time actually such visitors; or the stubborn muddled
|
|
|
|
|
> fascination with extrasensory perception as a supposed demonstration of a
|
|
|
|
|
> spiritual surround of our lives whence some authorization might come; or
|
|
|
|
|
> the use of psychotropic drugs as ways of contacting profounder realities,
|
|
|
|
|
> as they were for most of the American native Indian civilizations in the
|
|
|
|
|
> breakdown of their bicameral mind. Just as we saw in
|
|
|
|
|
> [previous parts of the book] that the collapse of the institutionalized
|
|
|
|
|
> oracles resulted in smaller cults of induced possession, so the waning of
|
|
|
|
|
> institutional religions is resulting in these smaller, more private
|
|
|
|
|
> religions of every description. And this historical process can be
|
|
|
|
|
> expected to increase the rest of this century.
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
> [...]
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
> Science then, for all its pomp of factness, is not unlike some of the more
|
|
|
|
|
> easily disparaged outbreaks of pseudoreligions. In this period of
|
|
|
|
|
> transition from its religious basis, science often shares with the
|
|
|
|
|
> celestial maps of astrology, or a hundred other irrationalisms, the same
|
|
|
|
|
> nostalgia for the Final Answer, the One Truth, the Single Cause. In the
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
> frustrations and sweat of laboratories, it feels the same temptations to
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
> swarm into sects, even as did the Khabiru refugees, and set out here and
|
|
|
|
|
> there through the dry Sinais of parched fact for some rich and brave
|
|
|
|
|
> significance flowing with truth and exaltation. And all of this, my
|
2011-03-11 10:40:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
> metaphor and all, is a part of this transitional period after the
|
|
|
|
|
> breakdown of the bicameral mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-09-05 14:50:29 +02:00
|
|
|
|
[^12]: Also note that John is trying to provide plausible reasons why Jesus was
|
|
|
|
|
taken from the cross so early. Did somebody get accused of fakery, I wonder?
|