muflax65ngodyewp.onion/content_blog/antinatalism/antinatalism-vs-annihilation.mkd

---
title: ! 'Antinatalism ≠ Annihilation '
date: 1970-01-01
tags: []
techne: :wip
episteme: :speculation
---

Recently, 

Antinatalism is not a fancy new term for annihilation.

Fundamentally, there are several arguments for antinatalism, and only one of those supports the annihilation of humanity, and even then only under very specific circumstances.


It would require that you have the technology to destroy all of humanity, but *not* to improve circumstances.


*That's a pretty small margin of error.* You better have a good argument for it.
basic port of content, some categories, daily log done 2012-04-12 19:01:00 +02:00			`---`
			`title: ! 'Antinatalism ≠ Annihilation '`
better reference handling * split reference file * internal links are cached and shared between sites * find duplicates with "nanoc dups" * minor clean-ups 2012-04-15 22:45:39 +02:00			`date: 1970-01-01`
basic port of content, some categories, daily log done 2012-04-12 19:01:00 +02:00			`tags: []`
			`techne: :wip`
			`episteme: :speculation`
			`---`

			`Recently,`

			`Antinatalism is not a fancy new term for annihilation.`

			`Fundamentally, there are several arguments for antinatalism, and only one of those supports the annihilation of humanity, and even then only under very specific circumstances.`



			`It would require that you have the technology to destroy all of humanity, but not to improve circumstances.`


ported all blogs 2012-04-16 15:33:11 +02:00			`That's a pretty small margin of error. You better have a good argument for it.`