2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
title: Antinatalism FAQ
|
|
|
|
date: 2011-11-16
|
|
|
|
techne: :incomplete
|
|
|
|
episteme: :believed
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> If only I could show you the places I have seen, you might understand the
|
|
|
|
> things I say. I have been to the Desolate Lands, wandered by those souls who
|
|
|
|
> still see the lands of the living but wear the cloak of the dead. Blind to
|
|
|
|
> their own ends, they cry, passing through one another like shadows in the
|
|
|
|
> dying light of day. I have travelled to where souls rot in torment, pierced
|
|
|
|
> with the jagged shards of life and vision, clinging to memory - regrets of
|
|
|
|
> the flesh. I saw that this prison was of their own making, and that the key
|
|
|
|
> was in unknowing, in release... and still, I travelled on.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> And finally, I came to the place where souls go to die. Where the mirrored and
|
|
|
|
> worn spirits fall into an endless sea of grey, mirrored glass, and I lowered
|
|
|
|
> myself within, and lay there among them, and I almost did not return.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> And do you know what I found there? There, among the silent and battered
|
|
|
|
> shells of the innumerable? Peace. Enlightenment. Truth. Only then did I realize
|
|
|
|
> that this place, this "Life", is an abomination, a horrible distortion of the
|
|
|
|
> natural order. This *"Life"*, who mothered Pain, and Fear, and Envy... these
|
|
|
|
> twisted children who exist only because we are here to feed them, to nourish
|
|
|
|
> them. This *"Life"*, this *afterthought* - a disturbance, a mere ripple in that
|
|
|
|
> great, dead sea, not even the cause, but merely an effect, sending these souls
|
|
|
|
> upwards, screaming for release from the day they are torn from their waters!
|
|
|
|
> The effect of what?!
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> I do not know. Nor do I care.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> Have you ever spoken with the dead? Called to them from this side? Called them
|
|
|
|
> from their silent rest? Do you know what it is that they feel? Pain. Pain,
|
|
|
|
> when torn into this wakefulness, this reminder of the chaos from which they
|
|
|
|
> had escaped. Pain - for having to live. There will be no more pain. There
|
|
|
|
> will be no more chaos.
|
|
|
|
>
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
> -- [Kerghan][] ([video][Kerghan Speech])
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Why You Got Screwed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why you have been harmed by coming into existence and nothing you can do will
|
|
|
|
make up for it.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
Range of Positions
|
|
|
|
==================
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Pronatalism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is never wrong to bring someone into existence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Minor Antinatalism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are some beings who are worse off, but on average, it works out. This
|
|
|
|
seems like the majority view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Major Antinatalism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some beings are better off alive, but on average, the harm dominates. So far,
|
|
|
|
this is for example the position of many transhumanists, who think that humanity
|
|
|
|
has a possible good future, but so far has mostly suffered. It is not too
|
|
|
|
unusual for people to hold off on having children because the world is too
|
|
|
|
horrible right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Categorical Antinatalism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is always wrong to bring someone into existence. *Every* being is worse off
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
alive. Even [Manabi][].
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
Arguments for Antinatalism
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
2011-11-26 01:58:08 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Escape from Kaldor Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
## The Asymmetry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## What about future versions of yourself?
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self, person-moments. Should you kill yourself right now?
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arguments against Antinatalism
|
|
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Your suffering is a First World Problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An anonymous commenter on [The View from Hell][] provides an example of this
|
|
|
|
common argument:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> I think your blog's title is a total misnomer: if you're still able
|
|
|
|
> (emotionally, physically and financially) to enjoy drugs, sex, running and
|
|
|
|
> talking about philosophy as you yourself claim you clearly haven't got the
|
|
|
|
> slightest notion of what hell consists of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In other words, if there are many people who are much worse off than you, you
|
|
|
|
can't claim to suffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I find that a very strange argument. If even privileged people suffer greatly,
|
|
|
|
isn't that an argument *for* antinatalism, namely that even greatly improved
|
|
|
|
average circumstances don't fix suffering? Shouldn't we therefore conclude that
|
|
|
|
many more people suffer than we typically think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What the arguments seems to be doing is to critize people for requesting help.
|
|
|
|
Basically, if someone else needs help much more than you, you shouldn't be
|
|
|
|
bringing your pain to our attention. You're just wasting resources that way.
|
|
|
|
That's not a bad point, but it is not an argument against preventing births. If
|
|
|
|
less people are made, less will suffer and we can take better care of the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practical Implications
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this just a contrarian position? Are you merely signalling how deep and
|
|
|
|
unconventional you are? After all, even professional ethicists aren't more
|
|
|
|
ethical on average[^ethicistfail].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[^ethicistfail]: See [Schwitzgebel's various studies][Schwitzgebel Ethics].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Moral Imperative
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison to Vampire RPG. In it, you are a recently turned vampire who has to
|
|
|
|
feed on the living to survive. Your constant hunger for blood makes it likely
|
|
|
|
that you will one day lose control and kill whoever you're feeding off. You must
|
|
|
|
exploit a large number of humans merely to survive. You know that this is wrong,
|
|
|
|
yet your own need to survive makes you do it anyway. You could do the right
|
|
|
|
thing anytime and just step out into the sun tomorrow. Yet you don't. No matter
|
|
|
|
what you tell yourself, you are evil.[^social]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[^social]: The analogy to our economy, social system and all of
|
|
|
|
industrialization is too obvious to ignore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
Religious Analogies
|
|
|
|
===================
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
This is not a completely serious section. It doesn't provide actual arguments,
|
|
|
|
really. Just because some religion or old ascetic supported something like
|
|
|
|
antinatalism, doesn't mean it's right. But I still find it interesting how
|
|
|
|
*common* the position actually is. There is obvious [memetic][meme] pressure to
|
|
|
|
remove antinatalism from any religion, but it still survives for some reason.
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Gnosticism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even Jesus was an Antinatalist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A minor remark: antinatalism also provides a solution to Anselm's ontological
|
|
|
|
argument, like so:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. God is the greatest possible being. (Definition)
|
|
|
|
2. It is best to not exist. (Antinatalism)
|
|
|
|
3. Therefore, God does not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Shakers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How not to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
## Buddhism
|
2011-11-16 13:33:17 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Manabi]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gakuen_Utopia_Manabi_Straight!
|
|
|
|
[Schwitzgebel Ethics]: http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.com/2007/04/moral-behavior-of-ethics-professors.html
|
|
|
|
[Kerghan]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcanum
|
|
|
|
[Kerghan Video]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkBrIrQikWY
|
2011-12-16 03:12:37 +01:00
|
|
|
[The View from Hell]: http://theviewfromhell.blogspot.com
|